(review in english below)
O pior Parsifal a que já assisti... Obviamente que não estou a falar da encenação, de Philipp Stölzl, a qual acho das melhores que já vi da obra juntamente com a do Guth e que foi um prazer rever. O resto é que foi globalmente mau e abaixo das expectativas.
A orquestra esteve nitidamente mal. A secção dos metais deu à vontade umas 10 a
15 fífias, desde entradas a medo e por isso meio desafinadas, até oscilações de
intensidade de som. As cordas também tiveram um momento pontual menos bom. Não
se sentiu a espiritualidade da música de Wagner
e penso que isso também se deveu ao maestro (Axel Kober), alguém que acredito demasiado inexperiente no
compositor. No primeiro acto fez demasiadas alterações de pace o que penso não
ter contribuído para a coesão dos diversos naipes e as incertezas das entradas
sem confiança dos metais. O aspecto geral traduzia uma orquestra "sacádica"
ou "sincopada", não obstante algumas passagens em que funcionou bem,
apesar da opção geral de um Parsifal rápido. Talvez o segundo acto tenha sido o
menos mal conseguido.
Em relação aos cantores:
Gurnemanz de Hans-Peter König não foi brilhante. Primeiro acto com baixa expressividade facial, sempre a olhar para o maestro. No primeiro monólogo deixou transparecer o que viria a ser demasiado evidente no último acto: uma rouquidão e um catarro, por vezes bem disfarçado, mas na maioria não, obrigando (e quero acreditar que foi esse o motivo) a respirações incorrectamente posicionadas nas frases melódicas, frequentemente respirando na última palavra ou na penúltima sílaba (ainda pior) antes do final da frase principalmente quando esta se prolongava no tempo ou era em agudo. O início do terceiro parecia melhor nestes pontos interpretativos e vocais mas, se mais natural na parte interpretativa, o mesmo não se pode dizer da parte vocal. E ele sabe que as coisas não correram bem e acenou no final como quem pede desculpa (mas para este público de hoje tudo pareceu óptimo !?...).
Gurnemanz de Hans-Peter König não foi brilhante. Primeiro acto com baixa expressividade facial, sempre a olhar para o maestro. No primeiro monólogo deixou transparecer o que viria a ser demasiado evidente no último acto: uma rouquidão e um catarro, por vezes bem disfarçado, mas na maioria não, obrigando (e quero acreditar que foi esse o motivo) a respirações incorrectamente posicionadas nas frases melódicas, frequentemente respirando na última palavra ou na penúltima sílaba (ainda pior) antes do final da frase principalmente quando esta se prolongava no tempo ou era em agudo. O início do terceiro parecia melhor nestes pontos interpretativos e vocais mas, se mais natural na parte interpretativa, o mesmo não se pode dizer da parte vocal. E ele sabe que as coisas não correram bem e acenou no final como quem pede desculpa (mas para este público de hoje tudo pareceu óptimo !?...).
O Amfortas de Bo
Skovhus foi melhor no terceiro do que no primeiro acto. No monólogo do
primeiro acto, na passagem mais séria do mesmo (quando diz "nahm ihm, nach
seinem"...) esteve completamente descoordenado do andamento da orquestra.
O seu sofrimento pareceu mais físico que da alma até porque foi bastante
"monocórdico" na interpretação. Terceiro acto melhor mas não tocante.
Tinha visto nesta encenação o Thomas Johannes Meier e que foi muito superior e
muito mais apaixonante de ouvir.
O Parsifal de Stefan
Vincke não é bom. Canta o Parsifal como canta o Siegfried e não pode ser.
Não tendo uma voz de heldentenor, até se aceita (como o aceitei no anel da Royal
Opera House) como Siegfried mas para Parsifal falta-lhe a capacidade de
produzir um som menos grosseiro, em que o timbre não mude com as diversas
intensidades imprimidas à voz e que seja capaz de modular a expressividade da
mesma com fineza e classe. O resultado, embora não estivesse mal do ponto de
vista corporal e interpretativo neste sentido, foi um Parsifal com aspecto de
velho, onde não se percebeu a transição de tolo para iluminado e que só lhe
faltou chamar Brunnhilde à Kundry, se me percebe...
Os melhores foram, sem dúvida o Titurel (Albert Pesendorfer), com
o timbre e profundidade que se espera para o papel, a Kundry da Evelyn Herlitzius que é realmente
brutal embora o seu estilo e voz inconfundível por vezes façam sentir os seus
agudos potentes com gritos, e o Klingsor (Bastiaan Everink) que,
não sendo um cantor de nível superlativo, cumpriu sem gaffes.
O coro também não esteve no seu melhor, principalmente no
final em que se notou a sobresaírem os tenores, criando um som pouco celestial.
Uma coisa que se nota e que me faz alguma impressão é que há
produções em que parece que os cantores não vivem o papel com paixão (não sei
se por encararem a ópera apenas como um trabalho, se estão cansados ou se não
tiveram tempo de ensaio suficiente) e depois resulta uma produção como esta em
que parece que cada um canta o seu papel e pronto, o que transparece não
interessa porque haverá quase sempre aplausos do público porque, para muitos
dos que ali vão, qualquer coisa serve.
Se comparasse o espectáculo e a paixão interpretativa que
foi toda a cena no quarto da Condessa nas Bodas de Figaro dois dias antes com
este Parsifal todo, diria que Mozart sorriu e Wagner bufou de raiva onde quer
que estejam...
PARSIFAL, Deutsche Oper,
Berlin, April 2014
The worst Parsifal I have ever seen ... Obviously I'm not talking about Philipp Stölzl’s staging, which is one of the best I've seen (along with Guth’s) and it was a pleasure to review it. The rest was bad and has been generally below expectations.
The orchestra was clearly bad. The metals section made 10-15 mistakes, including bad entries, oscillations of intensity and of tune. The strings were also less well once. I did not feel the spirituality of Wagner's music and I think it was also due to the conductor (Axel Kober), someone who I believe is too inexperienced on the composer. In the first act he made too many changes of pace that have not contributed to the cohesion of the various sections of the instruments. The general appearance represented a "saccadic " or "syncopated " orchestra, despite some parts that worked well, despite the general option of a fast Parsifal. Perhaps the second act was the more acceptable.
Regarding the singers:
Hans-Peter König´s Gurnemanz was not brilliant. In the first act he showed poor facial expressivity, always looking at the conductor. In the first monologue he hinted what would be too obvious in the last act: hoarseness and phlegm, sometimes well disguised, but mostly not, compelling (and I believe that was the reason) the incorrect breaths positioned in melodic phrases often breathing in ultimate or penultimate syllable (even worse) before the end of the phrase, especially when it is prolonged in time or was in a top note. In the beginning of the third act he looked better in these interpretative points but, if more natural interpretation on stage, the same can not be said of the vocal performance. And he knows that things did not go well at the end and waved as apologetic (but for this audience today everything seemed fine? ... ) .
Bo Skovhus’s Amfortas was better in the third than in the first act. In the monologue in the first act, particularly in the more serious part (when it says "nahm ihm, nach seinem" ...) he was completely uncoordinated in tempo with the orchestra. His suffering seemed more physical than of the soul because it was very "monotone" in interpretation. The third act was better but not touching. I had seen Thomas Johannes Meier before and he was far superior and more exciting to hear.
Stefan Vincke’s Parsifal is not good. He sings Parsifal as Siegfried and that can not be done. Not having a heldentenor voice one accepts as Siegfried (as I accepted in the Ring of the Royal Opera House), but as Parsifal he lacks the ability to produce a less coarse sound, where the tone does not change with the different intensities to the voice and that is capable of modulating the expression of the voice with class and finesse. The result, although not bad on the stage performance, was a Parsifal with the appearance of an old person, where you do not notice the transition from silly to illuminate, and that only he lacked to call Brunnhilde to Kundry. I do not understand.
The best were undoubtedly Titurel (Albert Pesendorfer), with the timbre and depth expected for the role, Kundry’s Evelyn Herlitzius which was really excellent, although her unmistakable voice style sometimes make feel her powerful top register hard, and Klingsor (Bastiaan Everink) while not being a superlative level singer, sang without mistakes.
The choir also was not at its best, especially at the end whe the tenors were particularly noted, creating a less heavenly sound.
One thing that strikes me is that there are productions in which it seems that the singers do not live the role with passion (not sure if by envisage the opera just as a job, if they are tired, or if they have not had time to rehearsal). Then appear productions like this, where it seems that everyone sings their role and that´s it, no matter what message passes, because there will almost always come applause of the audience because, for many who go there, anything goes.
Comparing the performance and interpretative passion that I had seen two days before in the Countess’s room in Marriage of Figaro with all this Parsifal, I would say that Mozart smiled while Wagner huffed in rage, wherever they are ...
Review by wagner_fanatic.
The worst Parsifal I have ever seen ... Obviously I'm not talking about Philipp Stölzl’s staging, which is one of the best I've seen (along with Guth’s) and it was a pleasure to review it. The rest was bad and has been generally below expectations.
The orchestra was clearly bad. The metals section made 10-15 mistakes, including bad entries, oscillations of intensity and of tune. The strings were also less well once. I did not feel the spirituality of Wagner's music and I think it was also due to the conductor (Axel Kober), someone who I believe is too inexperienced on the composer. In the first act he made too many changes of pace that have not contributed to the cohesion of the various sections of the instruments. The general appearance represented a "saccadic " or "syncopated " orchestra, despite some parts that worked well, despite the general option of a fast Parsifal. Perhaps the second act was the more acceptable.
Regarding the singers:
Hans-Peter König´s Gurnemanz was not brilliant. In the first act he showed poor facial expressivity, always looking at the conductor. In the first monologue he hinted what would be too obvious in the last act: hoarseness and phlegm, sometimes well disguised, but mostly not, compelling (and I believe that was the reason) the incorrect breaths positioned in melodic phrases often breathing in ultimate or penultimate syllable (even worse) before the end of the phrase, especially when it is prolonged in time or was in a top note. In the beginning of the third act he looked better in these interpretative points but, if more natural interpretation on stage, the same can not be said of the vocal performance. And he knows that things did not go well at the end and waved as apologetic (but for this audience today everything seemed fine? ... ) .
Bo Skovhus’s Amfortas was better in the third than in the first act. In the monologue in the first act, particularly in the more serious part (when it says "nahm ihm, nach seinem" ...) he was completely uncoordinated in tempo with the orchestra. His suffering seemed more physical than of the soul because it was very "monotone" in interpretation. The third act was better but not touching. I had seen Thomas Johannes Meier before and he was far superior and more exciting to hear.
Stefan Vincke’s Parsifal is not good. He sings Parsifal as Siegfried and that can not be done. Not having a heldentenor voice one accepts as Siegfried (as I accepted in the Ring of the Royal Opera House), but as Parsifal he lacks the ability to produce a less coarse sound, where the tone does not change with the different intensities to the voice and that is capable of modulating the expression of the voice with class and finesse. The result, although not bad on the stage performance, was a Parsifal with the appearance of an old person, where you do not notice the transition from silly to illuminate, and that only he lacked to call Brunnhilde to Kundry. I do not understand.
The best were undoubtedly Titurel (Albert Pesendorfer), with the timbre and depth expected for the role, Kundry’s Evelyn Herlitzius which was really excellent, although her unmistakable voice style sometimes make feel her powerful top register hard, and Klingsor (Bastiaan Everink) while not being a superlative level singer, sang without mistakes.
The choir also was not at its best, especially at the end whe the tenors were particularly noted, creating a less heavenly sound.
One thing that strikes me is that there are productions in which it seems that the singers do not live the role with passion (not sure if by envisage the opera just as a job, if they are tired, or if they have not had time to rehearsal). Then appear productions like this, where it seems that everyone sings their role and that´s it, no matter what message passes, because there will almost always come applause of the audience because, for many who go there, anything goes.
Comparing the performance and interpretative passion that I had seen two days before in the Countess’s room in Marriage of Figaro with all this Parsifal, I would say that Mozart smiled while Wagner huffed in rage, wherever they are ...
Review by wagner_fanatic.
Que lástima ! E em Berlim ! Mesmo com um maestro menor...
ResponderEliminarE o público, como reagiu ?
Não tarda nada só resta a Áustria para ver ópera de jeito.